Sales training · HR/L&D

Sales Training Books: What They Can and Cannot Teach

Sales training books can introduce useful ideas to your team. They cannot confirm that those ideas fit your customers, or that your people can apply them during a real sales conversation.

By Iain Swanston, Founder, Klozers

4 minute read
Diagram: a performance review based on opinion produces a conversation, while a review based on an agreed standard and dated evidence produces a decision. Four columns compare the two.
Books can introduce ideas, language and models. HR/L&D still has to identify what already works, define the capability gap, practise the behaviour, observe it and apply it in real sales work.
Answer

Sales training books can build knowledge, vocabulary and new ideas. They cannot demonstrate that a salesperson can use those ideas with a customer. HR/L&D should use books as learning inputs, then add practice, feedback and application to real selling situations, while preserving the successful behaviours that already exist inside the team.

Key takeaways

  1. Books can introduce concepts and create a common vocabulary for a sales team.
  2. Reading does not demonstrate performance in a live customer conversation.
  3. Practice should address defined capability gaps rather than replace effective internal behaviour.
  4. HR/L&D should identify existing top-performer practices before selecting external material.

What can sales training books do for your team?

Sales training books are useful when HR/L&D has a clear reason for using them. A book can introduce a concept, explain a type of sales conversation, provide examples and give colleagues a shared vocabulary. It can also help a learner prepare before a workshop or revisit an idea afterwards.

The limitation is equally clear. Reading is an input. Sales performance is an observed behaviour. A salesperson may understand an idea and still struggle to use it while listening to a customer, asking questions, responding to resistance or discussing commercial terms.

Books can provideBooks cannot verify
Concepts and explanationsWhether the person can apply them during a customer conversation
Examples and suggested questionsWhether the questions fit your market and customers
A common vocabularyWhether the behaviour is used consistently after learning
Ideas from outside the organisationWhether those ideas are better than the practices already used by your top performers
Knowledge is useful. Capability requires evidence in practice.
Bespoke sales training
You are not buying a day of training.

You are buying a change in how your team sells, and the proof that it worked. A short call to work out what would need to change, and a date that works

What does research say about practice and skilled performance?

In a 2014 meta-analysis published in Psychological Science, Brooke Macnamara, David Hambrick and Frederick Oswald found that deliberate practice explained 18% of the variance in performance in sport and 21% in music. The study did not examine sales. It is adjacent evidence showing that structured practice is associated with measurable differences in skilled performance. View the PubMed research record.

Diagram: two certifications. Candidate is awarded on day two and expires on day 90. Certified is awarded on day 90 on ten requirements evidenced on live accounts and signed by the participant's own manager, and is valid twelve months.
Measured in the cited 2014 meta-analysis: deliberate practice explained 18% of performance variance in sport and 21% in music. This is adjacent-skill evidence, not a sales-performance finding.

The practical implication for HR/L&D is limited but useful. A book may help someone understand what good performance should involve. The organisation still needs a way to practise the behaviour, observe it and give specific feedback. Without that step, completion of reading is evidence of reading, not evidence of sales capability.

Why should HR/L&D begin with internal best practice?

A standard reading list assumes that the useful answer comes from outside the organisation. That assumption can remove practices that already work. Klozers uses a different design sequence. Before programme design, we interview the client’s top performers one to one. Their successful behaviours become part of the programme. Proprietary material is then used only where an identified gap remains.

This is the Klozers best-practice-first principle, recorded as asset E13 in the Proprietary Asset Register. It matters because experienced salespeople do not need to discard effective behaviour simply because a published author uses different language or a different process.

“The best sales book can give your team new ideas. It cannot tell you which of those ideas fit your customers, your market and the way your best salespeople already sell.”

How should HR/L&D use sales training books?

Choose material against a defined learning need. If the capability gap concerns prospecting, discovery, negotiation, account management or another sales skill, select material that addresses that need directly. Avoid choosing a book because it is popular or because another company uses it.

Then separate the idea from the behaviour. Ask what the learner should be able to do differently after reading. Define where that behaviour should appear in the sales process. Give the learner an opportunity to practise it. Observe the attempt. Give feedback. Finally, test the behaviour in the person’s real work.

For a private team programme, this is where bespoke sales training programmes has a different role from a reading list. The programme can incorporate useful external knowledge without treating it as the starting point for everybody.

When are sales training books the wrong solution?

Books are the wrong primary intervention when the problem is not knowledge. A salesperson may already know that they should prepare, ask better questions, reach additional stakeholders or discuss value earlier. More information will not solve a failure to apply behaviour that is already understood.

HR/L&D should distinguish between a knowledge gap and an application gap before selecting learning content. The article on why sales training fails explains why knowledge can disappear from daily practice. The broader sales training guide covers how capability development can be connected to real sales work.

Do this on Monday
  1. Choose one sales capability that the team needs to improve.
  2. Ask two top performers how they currently handle that situation with customers.
  3. Compare their approach with the ideas in any book you are considering.
  4. Design one practice activity that lets learners apply the useful idea and receive feedback.

What questions should HR/L&D ask about sales training books?

Can salespeople learn from sales training books?

Yes. Books can introduce concepts, language and examples. They do not provide evidence that a salesperson can apply those ideas in a customer conversation.

Yes, where the book supports a defined capability need. The learning design should also include practice, observation, feedback and application to the organisation’s own customer situations.

Choose books against a specific capability gap rather than popularity. Confirm that the ideas fit the organisation’s customers, sales environment and existing successful practices.

It can, but that creates a risk that external practices replace effective internal practices. Klozers recommends identifying what top performers already do before adding external material.

Founder & Lead Trainer Klozers · London, Dortmund, Austin, Melbourne

Iain has trained and coached B2B sales teams since 2008. He was Lead Trainer and Coach at Microsoft Scotland. Before that he sold capital equipment and managed sales teams in the UK and North America. He served as an Associate at Strathclyde University Business School, where he delivered the sales content for the Masters in Entrepreneurship from 2015 to 2019.

Connect with Iain on LinkedIn

Bespoke sales training
You are not buying a day of training.

You are buying a change in how your team sells, and the proof that it worked. A short call to work out what would need to change, and a date that works